Politics and Religion

7 06 2007

Politics and religion, two topics that no-one ever has strong feelings about…  😉 

Stem cell research has long been a hot topic but recently it’s become positively searing.  Pollies in NSW have recently been arguing like children debating legislation that will allow therapeutic cloning. 

I’m all for pursuing stem-cell research.  Apart from the great potential benefits it offers, history has shown that attempting to prevent the relentless onslaught of scientific exploration is futile.  If science wants to learn about something, science will. 

But my stance on stem cell research isn’t the topic of this post. 

George Pell, the Catholic Archbishop of NSW, has strong feelings about stem cell research.  Something along the lines of "no bloody way".  And his opinion is what this post is about (sort of).  I’m more than happy for Pell to argue his opinion – everyone ought to have that right – but I disagree with John Howard and believe that Pell crossed a fine line earlier this week.  He stated that "It is a serious moral matter and Catholic politicians who vote for this legislation must realise that their voting has consequences for their place in the life of the Church".  Maybe I’m reading too much into it but if this were the Soprano’s that’d be analgous to "do what I say or I’ll break your knees".  😉

Many Catholic MP’s were upset at being torn between their religion and their opinion and weren’t happy with Pell’s stance.

That was two days ago.  Today the bill was passed through with an overwhelming majority: 65 to 26.  So, thankfully, many Catholic MP’s decided that their opinion didn’t have to match church decree. Next it goes to the upper house for further debate. Lets hope that religion and politics can continue to remain separate.




One response

8 06 2007


Religion *is* a set of doctrines that dictate your attitude and behaviour in life. If a politician considers himself religious, he cannot possibly seperate his political beliefs from his religious ones.

George Pell’s statements were exactly what we should expect from the leadership of any religion.

“I have a god & I have/support an agenda. Since you claim to believe in my god, you must follow the same agenda as me, or else our god will punish you.”

In short: “Do what your told, or my imaginary friend will beat you up when you die.”

Fear and guilt – how else would a religion push its agenda?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: